APIs - Application Programming Interface
APIs are used for Communications
Abstraction hiding the implementation of process , ex if you hit the POST call its will go to the Server and its post the data but actually the POST doesn’t know the How its implementing in Server
Platform Agnostic – Service are written in the Different language and different platform can easily Communicate with each other using APIs
Examples / Use Cases of APIs
Private APIs – Hidden APIs that only an Applications running on your Device or Phone its access to not for public use Ex : Payment Apps
Public APIs - Its available for public Ex : Google Map
Web APIs – Super set of Public & Private APIs , The Application which running on Cloud can Interact with each other using Web APIs Ex : Instagram Post
SDK / Library APIs – Threating Library which expose the function like Lock , Release , Fork , Join we can use this APIs
API Factors :
API Contracts
Documentation
Data format
Security
API Standards
RPC
SOAP
REST
Here’s a comparison between RPC , SOAP , and REST APIs:
1. RPC (Remote Procedure Call)
Concept : RPC allows a program to execute procedures (methods or functions) on a remote server as if they were local calls. The server and client communicate using a specified protocol.
Protocol : Can use various protocols (e.g., HTTP, XML-RPC, JSON-RPC).
Message Format : Typically uses lightweight message formats like JSON or XML.
Usage : It is ideal for scenarios where you need direct method/function calls across different systems.
Pros :
Easy to understand and implement.
Suitable for microservices that need to expose simple function-based interactions.
Cons :
Tight coupling between client and server.
Less flexibility than REST.
2. SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol)
Concept : SOAP is a protocol for exchanging structured information in web services. It uses XML to format the data and operates over various application layer protocols like HTTP, SMTP.
Protocol : Follows strict rules and standards (such as WS-Security, WS-AtomicTransaction, etc.).
Message Format : XML-based message structure.
Usage : Preferred in enterprise-level applications where security, ACID transactions, or complex operations are crucial (e.g., financial systems).
Pros :
Built-in standards for security, transactions, etc.
Works well with stateful operations.
Cons :
Heavyweight due to the extensive use of XML.
Slower performance compared to REST because of overhead.
3. REST (Representational State Transfer)
Concept : REST is an architectural style that uses standard HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE) for interacting with resources represented by URLs.
Protocol : Uses HTTP/HTTPS for communication.
Message Format : Flexible, often uses JSON or XML for data representation.
Usage : Widely used for web services due to its simplicity and scalability (e.g., CRUD operations).
Pros :
Lightweight and stateless.
Flexible and scalable.
Better performance than SOAP in most cases.
Cons :
No built-in standards for security and transactions (can be added separately).
May not be suitable for highly complex interactions.
Key Differences:
Feature | RPC | SOAP | REST |
Protocol | Various (e.g., JSON-RPC) | Strict (HTTP, SMTP) | HTTP/HTTPS |
Message Format | JSON, XML | XML | JSON, XML, others |
Coupling | Tight coupling | High (with strict rules) | Loose coupling |
Complexity | Simple | Complex (many standards) | Simple and lightweight |
Performance | Faster, lightweight | Slower due to overhead | Typically fast |
Security | Depends on implementation | Built-in security (WS-Security) | External (e.g., OAuth, HTTPS) |
Each has its strengths, depending on the use case (e.g., SOAP for secure enterprise systems, REST for scalable web services, RPC for simple function calls).